Ads

MOMocrats Mall

Hey Kids!

  • My site was nominated for Best Political Blog!
  • MOMocrats™ is a trademark of this blog, our podcast, and its owners Glennia Campbell and Stefania Pomponi Butler. © MOMocrats™ 2007-2008. All rights reserved.
  • take me to kirtsy!
  • BlogBurst.com
  • Politics Blogs - Blog Top Sites

Banner Designed by:

  • Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket
Blog powered by TypePad

« McCain: Slithery or Dithery? | Main | Obama campaign launches Spanish-language campaign strategy and skips TX, CA »

July 23, 2008

Senate proposal would require 50% of US cars to have flexible fuel system by 2012

E85_car_2007_sebring Senators John Thune (R-South Dakota.), Sam Brownback (R-Kansas), Ken Salazar (D-Colorado), Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Joseph Lieberman (I-Connecticut) introduced the Open Fuel Standard Act (PDF) yesterday.

The Act would require 50% of all new vehicles sold in the United States to have a flexible fuel system by 2012, and 80% of all new vehicles to have the system by 2015.

Flexible fuel vehicles are able to switch among a variety of fuels, primarily gasoline and ethanol. Hwever, the bill encourages and covers all types of potential alternative fuels, such as biodiesel, switchgrass and other energy crops, coal, agricultural bi-products, corn, soybeans, natural gas and other materials

The goal of this bill is to break the OPEC "stranglehold" on available fuel and fuel pricing.

"In Kansas, and across the nation, people are concerned about the rising price of gasoline," said Brownback. "Today, I was pleased to join a tri-partisan group of senators to introduce the Open Fuel Standard Act. This legislation will reduce America's dependence on foreign oil and will increase consumers' options when it comes to fuel."

It's also intended to provide American consumers with greater fuel choices and flexibility to purchase the best priced fuel.

"This legislation gives Americans a choice at the pump by making fuel flexibility a standard feature of the majority of cars and trucks produced in the United States," said Senator Salazar. "In doing so, we will protect consumers from soaring gas prices, reduce our dependence on foreign oil, and spur the further development of renewable fuel technologies that are central to our energy future. As our presence here today demonstrates, setting America on a path of energy independence is an effort that transcends party lines. We must all work together to make this vision of energy independence a reality."

According to Waste News, Thune said that recently, Congress has enacted several policies that have expanded the production of renewable fuel. By 2022, renewable fuel will constitute approximately one-fourth of America´s fuel supply. However, without more flex fuel vehicles, E-85 pumps, and ethanol-dedicated pipelines, the full potential of renewable fuel is greatly limited, Thune said.

Chrysler, Ford, General Motors, Isuzu, Mazda, Mercedes, Mercury, and Nissan all currently offer flexible fuel and E85 compatible vehicles. For more information or to see if your car is E85 compatible, click here.

Julie Pippert, of Using My Words and Moms Speak Up, is saddened to not see her beloved Forester on the list of E85 compatible vehicles.

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

dude, Jules, this is a kick-ass post. thanks. :)

Does this percentage requirement only apply to internal combustion vehicles?

Because I think this is a great idea, but I'd hate to see all-electric plug-ins pushed aside because the legislation failed to accommodate them as well.

Great Q, J. Mine was: hmm, intriguing direction for legislation. Car manufacturers keeps dismissing other types of alt power for vehicles because it's not economically feasible. Is this one more so? And if so, has it excluded other power alternatives to pursue a fuel-powered car? Good Qs. I'll try to follow up later. I have a press office contact. Right now I am railing on the Obama campaign Hispanic strategy.

This is exciting!

I am concerned by the push towards ethanol when everything that I've read shows it to be equally as bad for the environment as fossil fuels, if not worse. But I'm glad that this legislation doesn't limit the potential and merely takes steps to disengage us from our dependency on OPEC. I applaud that it's only 4 years out, I really hope that this goes through!

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Just So We're Clear

  • Comment Policy
    Please feel free to comment, debate, or ask questions. We reserve the right to delete, edit, or moderate any comments that are offensive, libelous, harassing, off-topic spam, or that attempt to intimidate our contributors or our readers. In other words, mind your manners or you may get a time out.
  • Affiliations
    The MOMocrats™ site is not affiliated with or paid for by any Democratic candidate, PAC or the Democratic National Committee. The opinions expressed here are those of the individual authors.

Listen to Your Mother: The MOMocrats Podcast

  • MOMocrats - MOMocrats - MOMocrats

We're Lijit

Momocrats Feed You



  • Add to Google Reader or Homepage


  • Subscribe in Bloglines


  • Add to netvibes


  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online

We Got Their Back

Something To Write Home About