Ads

MOMocrats Mall

Hey Kids!

  • My site was nominated for Best Political Blog!
  • MOMocrats™ is a trademark of this blog, our podcast, and its owners Glennia Campbell and Stefania Pomponi Butler. © MOMocrats™ 2007-2008. All rights reserved.
  • take me to kirtsy!
  • BlogBurst.com
  • Politics Blogs - Blog Top Sites

Banner Designed by:

  • Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket
Blog powered by TypePad

« Sarah's Greatest Hits [5 minutes of the best of the worst] | Main | Michigan, McCain Doesn't Care About You »

October 02, 2008

Palin on the Supreme Court.

I know the economic crisis is looming large for all of us. But as October begins, so too is the Supreme Court’s fall term.

In the upcoming term, SCOTUS will be considering a number of cases important to women and their families:

Why I am mentioning this? Well, it seems Sarah Palin has no real opinion about the Supreme Court. I mean, she can’t name any decisions that she disagrees with – maybe she’ll round them up and bring ‘em to us real soon?

She couldn’t even go for something easy like Plessy v. Ferguson? Or Lochner?

Forgive my eye rolling. Or, on second thought, don’t. SCOTUS is a very real campaign issue, what with John Paul Stevens turning 89 this April, and Ruth Bader Ginsberg (my daughter’s namesake) turning 76, and it isn’t as though David Souter or Anthony Kennedy are wise-cracking youngsters either.

So, please heed Michelle Obama’s call and register to vote. And then vote for the candidate and his running mate who actually seem to be able to string words together about one of the most storied institutions in America.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e54ee3789588330105351edc98970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Palin on the Supreme Court. :

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Excellent post, Melissa! I think we see how deep (or shallow) Palin's knowledge of American governance and democratic institutions are.

Oh dear, that comment wasn't remotely grammatical. Fitting, given the person discussed?

Anyway, y'all get my drift. Comment in haste, repent at leisure.

Biden went on far too long in the first question. He had great substance but he sort of loses the audience along the way. On the other hand his command of the issues is amazing. His church/state answer was beautiful. Hers...

I'm trying to think of a synonym for retarded that's more PC.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Just So We're Clear

  • Comment Policy
    Please feel free to comment, debate, or ask questions. We reserve the right to delete, edit, or moderate any comments that are offensive, libelous, harassing, off-topic spam, or that attempt to intimidate our contributors or our readers. In other words, mind your manners or you may get a time out.
  • Affiliations
    The MOMocrats™ site is not affiliated with or paid for by any Democratic candidate, PAC or the Democratic National Committee. The opinions expressed here are those of the individual authors.

Listen to Your Mother: The MOMocrats Podcast

  • MOMocrats - MOMocrats - MOMocrats

We're Lijit

Momocrats Feed You



  • Add to Google Reader or Homepage


  • Subscribe in Bloglines


  • Add to netvibes


  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online

We Got Their Back

Something To Write Home About