In reviewing some of the SCHIP debate, can I say that I am so tired of the constant wringing of hands over regular order?
Regular order is pretty much what it
sounds like – the normal process by which bills are passed through
Congress. Each Congress adopts rules that govern action and parliamentary procedures.
For those of us who grew up with Schoolhouse
Rock, it is, unfortunately, much more complicated than sitting in committee, knowing
you’ll be a law one day.
There are multiple and overlapping points at which bill can be killed,
from points of order to motions to recommit to stalling/delaying tactics
like refusing to waive the reading of a bill to the filibuster.
When the Republicans start pointing fingers over normal order, I wonder if anyone in this town has any institutional memory. Or shame.
After all, when the Republicans where in the majority, they refused to call hearings, shut Democrats out of the debate on Medicare Part D (prescription drug benefit) in 2003, the energy bill... And let’s not forget former Majority Leader Bill Frist’s threat to use what has been dubbed the “nuclear option” to prevent filibusters over judicial nominations.
But just because the Republicans operated
by streamroller doesn’t mean the Democrats should.
I would like there to be regular order.
I would like bill--->hearing--->markup--->
Normal order is important when situations
are normal. It is not appropriate in cases of natural disaster, war,
famine, flood, etc. And it isn’t appropriate here.
This bill is a re-tread two very carefully
considered pieces of legislation. (And to Mr. Culberson: If hearings
on SCHIP didn’t happen, can I get back the hours I spent sitting listening
to the clerk of House Energy and Commerce because your colleagues refused
to dispense with the reading of the bill? No? Didn’t think so.)
Besides that, SCHIP is seriously short on cash. States are facing shortfalls, a problem that is especially hard on children of color.
Recent Comments