The National Tea Party Convention being held this week in Nashville, sponsored by the Tea Party Nation group run by Tennessee traffic law attorney Judson Phillips, has been calling its 600 convention attendees "delegates." If you've been following media coverage of this event, you may have seen news organizations (outside of Fox) printing the term in scare quotes as I just did, or referring to the Tea Party attendees as "so-called delegates." Why?
As a former delegate to the 2008 Missouri Democratic Convention, I can tell you exactly why.
Here is the Merriam Webster dictionary definition of the verb, to delegate:
1 : to entrust to another <delegate authority>
2 : to appoint as one's representative
At a traditional political convention, whether at the state or national level, the delegates in attendance have been entrusted with the authority to represent other members of the party. Though the selection process for political convention delegates varies from party to party and state to state — some convention delegates (like the Democratic Party's superdelegates) are appointed by party officials at the national, state, or local level; some are actually elected by party members at local meetings held before the convention takes place — the position of delegate is meant to be a representative one. As in, delegates undertake their duties with the explicit understanding that they have been invited to a convention not to represent their own personal interests, but to represent the interests of a group — the interests of their city or township, for example, or, at the national level, the interests of their state.
In the United States, the Democratic Party, the Republican Party, the Green Party, the Socialist Party, and the Libertarian Party all nominate their convention delegates as representatives.
In fact, the Democratic Party goes one step further than some in selecting its delegates to be representative of its constituency as a whole, by actively encouraging those members of the party who select party delegates to include a proportionate number of women, racial and ethnic minorities, veterans and people with disabilities. So the delegates who wind up attending a Democratic National Convention are meant to fairly represent not only a full spectrum of regional concerns, but also the diverse concerns of various other special groups within the party.
The attendees at the National Tea Party Convention were not selected by local party members or state party leaders to represent a specific region or an interest group. The attendees at the National Tea Party Convention are a self-selected group of people who paid a hefty $549 attendance fee.
The Tea Party "delegates" were not chosen to go to the Tea Party Convention. They chose to go. And only those who could afford the convention ticket price were allowed.
I did not have to pay for a pricey ticket to be a delegate to the Missouri State Democratic Convention. I was chosen at a local Democratic Party meeting to be sent to represent my township at the state convention. Once there, I voted to help elect delegates to represent my state at the Democratic National Convention.
Which brings me to another key difference between the National Tea Party Convention and a traditional political party convention: as a delegate to my state Democratic Party convention, I didn't just have a responsibility to represent fellow Democrats from my neighborhood — I also had power.
I did not spend the entire convention socializing with local political celebrities, purchasing party merchandise and listening to motivational speakers. As I delegate, I had the opportunity not only to help choose my state's delegates to the national convention, but also to vote on matters of state party business. I had to research party issues and candidates for party positions. My decisions, and the decisions of my fellow delegates, had real consequences for the party statewide.
As far as I can tell, the most pressing decision the delegates at the National Tea Party Convention have to make this weekend is what to wear to the Sarah Palin banquet.
So, despite its political-sounding name, the National Tea Party convention is not, in fact, a traditional party convention.
Admittedly, the Tea Party movement has not had a great deal of time to build the sort of national infrastructure required to hold a real political convention. But the convention in Nashville has faced widespread criticism, even from conservative bloggers and the leaders of other Tea Party organizations, for being too tightly controlled by its self-appointed leader, Judson Phillips, too expensive, too explicitly for-profit — too much like a business, and too little like a party.
As many astute political pundits have recently noted, if Congresswoman Michelle Bachmann backs out of speaking at your conservative political event because she thinks your management style is too controversial, your credibility might be in trouble.
What is caffeine government? Do they mean stimulant free?
Yes, no stimulus unless its the stimulus THEY agree with, you know, like building bombs and missile defense systems that don't work. Oh, and invading COUNTRIES based on lies...can't forget that biggie.
Stimulus that puts actual human beings back to work or keeps them healthy...ha, now THATS socialism.
I want my country back and I want Sarah Palin to just go away.
Posted by: Amy in OHio | February 07, 2010 at 06:19 AM
I think it says a lot that the only two words on that sign with more than one syllable were misspelled. If they can't spell the word "government" I must question their ability to understand the complex issues and problems facing this nation today. We are not going to get out of the current fiscal mess and make progress in all the other areas of concern by chanting simplistic slogans, spreading hate & intolerance, or by denying science.
Posted by: jan baxter | February 07, 2010 at 05:23 PM
Jaelithe - well thought out, great point. Amy and Jan, I'm with you all the way. I, too, laughed that two words on a six word sign were spelled incorrectly. But focusing on something like that - well, I'm sure I'd be called an elitist. Let's all find a way to get our voices heard louder than the loudmouths of the Tea Party. I ranted on my site today because that's what Palin does to me. She makes me foam at the mouth. Check it out if you get a chance.
Posted by: Daily Cup of Jo | February 08, 2010 at 07:37 PM
Great post and terrific blog. This is my first time here.
What I find interesting is that the people who attended were called "deligates." Now they're being called leaders - I'm sure because the attendence was so poor. 600.
Posted by: Leslie Parsley | February 09, 2010 at 08:10 PM
Granted, not all Tea Party folks are Harvard graduates, but our Democratic leadership are of the other extreme; the 'arrogant intelligentsia' - completely out of touch with the electorate. Martha Coakley, for example was decorating her office in DC just days before the election while Scott Brown was changing American politics for the next decade. Patches Kennedy, the 'limousine liberal' namesake just bailed rather than suffer the embarrassment of a landslide loss (condolences for the loss of his father). Tea Party folks are mostly average citizens who believe that America's children and grandchildren can't afford new entitlements and middle-class killing bills. You can help change history with your free Scott Brown for President bumper sticker available while supplies last at http://ScottBrownForPresident.com
Posted by: ScottBrownPres | February 12, 2010 at 05:36 PM